Pardon?
Because of the recent death of former President Ford, there has been a lot of re-hashing of Ford's pardon of his predecessor. Apparently, the current conventional wisdom is that Ford did the right thing in that he saved the U.S. from great pain and divisiveness of the trial of a U.S. president. Even Senator Kennedy is apologizing for his then criticism of Ford for the pardon, saying that he now believes that Ford did the right thing.
I have to ask if anyone else has thought the following other than me (because I haven't seen or heard it anywhere else and I'm not that original a thinker): Isn't it ironic that the Rs devoted incredible amounts of time, energy and money into an investigation called "Whitewater" that found NOTHING and then tried President Clinton for the crime of lying to a grand jury about sex (that was with a consenting adult, if not appropriate for various other reasons). This was after an investigation so mean-spirited and vast that it included research into what books Monica Lewinksy purchased and the publication of lurid sexual details.
Nixon, on the other hand, was guilty of not only every-day crimes (conspiracy, accessory to burglary) but Constitutional offenses.
Interesting that Ford can be called heroic for saving the nation from all that trauma and yet there is no mention of what the Rs did to the American people more recently.
Not to mention that Reagan wiped his butt with the Constitution ("Iran-Contra") and got a free pass. And W. thinks that the Executive branch is the only one that matters and the Constitution is for just for appearances.
I'm open to a debate as to whether the Nixon pardon was the right thing to do. BUT looking back at the past but not applying it to what happened after is at best not helpful. One could also call it cowardly or deceitful.
I have to ask if anyone else has thought the following other than me (because I haven't seen or heard it anywhere else and I'm not that original a thinker): Isn't it ironic that the Rs devoted incredible amounts of time, energy and money into an investigation called "Whitewater" that found NOTHING and then tried President Clinton for the crime of lying to a grand jury about sex (that was with a consenting adult, if not appropriate for various other reasons). This was after an investigation so mean-spirited and vast that it included research into what books Monica Lewinksy purchased and the publication of lurid sexual details.
Nixon, on the other hand, was guilty of not only every-day crimes (conspiracy, accessory to burglary) but Constitutional offenses.
Interesting that Ford can be called heroic for saving the nation from all that trauma and yet there is no mention of what the Rs did to the American people more recently.
Not to mention that Reagan wiped his butt with the Constitution ("Iran-Contra") and got a free pass. And W. thinks that the Executive branch is the only one that matters and the Constitution is for just for appearances.
I'm open to a debate as to whether the Nixon pardon was the right thing to do. BUT looking back at the past but not applying it to what happened after is at best not helpful. One could also call it cowardly or deceitful.
posted by Daniel wbc at 11:38 PM
2 Comments:
Speaking of "w", the repugs and Jerry Ford, check out Jeff Black's theory on the HornyRabbit blog. Makes you wonder, eh??
I agree with you. The pardon set the precedent that Presidents are above the law and the results are clear with Reagan and "W" Bush shredding the constitution for political gain.
Post a Comment
<< Home